Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press





Per Rønne wrote:
>
> Seppo Renfors <Renfors@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Aha.... and pray tell how could it have found it's way to where it was
> > found some 100 years before any other known European people visited
> > the area?
>
> Because it never found it ways to Minnesota a century before any other
> Europeans visited the area.

Are you saying someone in Sweden/Norway brought the stone with them,
that had been carved some 100 years earlier? That they managed to
plant this large stone under a tree before anyone arrived in the
district?

> It was found 1898.

So? It most certainly was NOT carved then, but at least 100 years
before that.

Fact: The stone was under a tree that had germinated and grown over
the stone.
Fact: That tree dated back to before any Europeans were in that
district.
Fact: The tree's age predates Ohman's arrival in the USA.
Fact: the runes were carved at least 100 years before the stone was
found.

These are ALL established facts. You cannot get away from them,
WITHOUT a study showing ALL of those to be wrong. It isn't sufficient
you question ONE point and place that in doubt you have to disprove
all of them. No point in ignoring these facts, they have been
established via studies, observations, sworn statements and the like.

> And let me quote from the
> Great Danish Encyclopædia:

No not interested as there is no consensus on the item yet.
>

[..]

> > It is not available unless one registers - and I'm (relatively) spam
> > free, so I'm not about to change that.
>
> It doesn't give spam to register as reader of newspapers on the net.
> Nevertheless, I think access demands subsription to the paper.

Maybe not directly - however they may well sell their list of
subscribers - alternately fall victim to a worm. I think you are also
right on the subscription.


--
http://tinyurl.com/al225
http://tinyurl.com/alznw
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
    ... >>> Europeans visited the area. ... >> Are you saying someone in Sweden/Norway brought the stone with them, ... it was carved in Minnesota. ... The stone was under a tree that had germinated and grown over ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Illness brought down early human rival:Neanderthal
    ... A similar number of savannah humans starting with Erectus have been identified which are also extinct. ... There is no apparent combat edge between the basic stone ax and the work of art stone ax. ... They would certainly have moved inland as best weather conditions and glaciers permitted. ... What they do have is an unending supply of Europeans entering the country and moving west to take it from the Amerinds. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
    ... and it would have eaten into the stone. ... >> his estimate of age of last glacial movement in the area was ... for the KRS tree, based on ring counts from other similar trees. ... The annual rings of growth on these sections can be counted as ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
    ... >>> his estimate of age of last glacial movement in the area was ... >>> The roots were not said to be wrapped around the stone, ... >for the KRS tree, based on ring counts from other similar trees. ... > annual rings; ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Hooked X Runes and where they have been found.
    ... wrapped around the tree and then put back in the ground. ... Now try to imagine those roots several decades younger and more flexible. ... inches in diameter at six or eight inches sbove the stone. ... In the spring subsequent to the finding of the stone Mr. Samuel Olson ...
    (sci.archaeology)

Loading