Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Seppo Renfors <Renfors@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 08:08:14 GMT
Per Rønne wrote:
>
> Seppo Renfors <Renfors@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Aha.... and pray tell how could it have found it's way to where it was
> > found some 100 years before any other known European people visited
> > the area?
>
> Because it never found it ways to Minnesota a century before any other
> Europeans visited the area.
Are you saying someone in Sweden/Norway brought the stone with them,
that had been carved some 100 years earlier? That they managed to
plant this large stone under a tree before anyone arrived in the
district?
> It was found 1898.
So? It most certainly was NOT carved then, but at least 100 years
before that.
Fact: The stone was under a tree that had germinated and grown over
the stone.
Fact: That tree dated back to before any Europeans were in that
district.
Fact: The tree's age predates Ohman's arrival in the USA.
Fact: the runes were carved at least 100 years before the stone was
found.
These are ALL established facts. You cannot get away from them,
WITHOUT a study showing ALL of those to be wrong. It isn't sufficient
you question ONE point and place that in doubt you have to disprove
all of them. No point in ignoring these facts, they have been
established via studies, observations, sworn statements and the like.
> And let me quote from the
> Great Danish Encyclopædia:
No not interested as there is no consensus on the item yet.
>
[..]
> > It is not available unless one registers - and I'm (relatively) spam
> > free, so I'm not about to change that.
>
> It doesn't give spam to register as reader of newspapers on the net.
> Nevertheless, I think access demands subsription to the paper.
Maybe not directly - however they may well sell their list of
subscribers - alternately fall victim to a worm. I think you are also
right on the subscription.
--
http://tinyurl.com/al225
http://tinyurl.com/alznw
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- References:
- Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Kjetil Rå Hauge
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alaca
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Prev by Date: Re: Wolter claims secret code hidden in Kensington Runestone
- Next by Date: Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Previous by thread: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by thread: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading