Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)

Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> says in
news:dvuf91d6qlvvbslkdargfmdoapumm8ndo7@xxxxxxx:

> On Sat, 28 May 2005 04:31:36 GMT, Philip Deitiker
> <Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> says in
>>news:0iof91pml844lqaeanmvvlfm3o20nbduqb@xxxxxxx:
>>
>>> On Sat, 28 May 2005 01:24:47 GMT, Philip Deitiker
>>> <Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> says in
>>>>news:t7ef91dm7ac6h96p9i24c7utqed9carf5e@xxxxxxx:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 27 May 2005 09:44:12 -0600, "Tedd Jacobs"
>>>>> <Jacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Eric Stevens" wrote...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>leave it to eric...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Would you rather it was Philip? :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> I did look before I responded. As far as I can tell, the only
>>>>> article by Paul Burke in which he starts a new thread is the
>>>>> one in which he complains about the range of topics presently
>>>>> under discussion. This is not an uncommon phenomenon and the
>>>>> cure may be partly in his own hands.
>>>>
>>>>His point is that you always take exception with what might be,
>>>>when it is obvious that we are arguing about what will never be.
>>>>Your not under attack here Eric, you actually know where to find
>>>>solid ground if you so choose. Although frequently you choose
>>>>not to :^).
>>>>
>>> My preferred line is "Build not your arguments on sand".
>>
>>Which randomly means 75% of the time you build it on water.
>>
> I thought sand was at the bottom of that also?

For most of the world it is detritus (a.k.a mud)

.

Relevant Pages