Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press


"Per Rønne" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:1gx9uup.1xp397esxb464N%spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Seppo Renfors <Renfors@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Per Rønne wrote:
> > >
> > > Seppo Renfors <Renfors@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Aha.... and pray tell how could it have found it's way to where it
was
> > > > found some 100 years before any other known European people visited
> > > > the area?
> > >
> > > Because it never found it ways to Minnesota a century before any other
> > > Europeans visited the area.
> >
> > Are you saying someone in Sweden/Norway brought the stone with them,
> > that had been carved some 100 years earlier? That they managed to
> > plant this large stone under a tree before anyone arrived in the
> > district?
>
> No, it was carved in Minnesota. In the late 1800s.

That Per Rønne has been proven a false statement as well as a false
assumption. I take it that you due to your prejudice hasn't taken yourself
time to read Wolter's as well as the others testresults or you definitely
haven't understood what's shown beyond any reasonable doubts in those: When
ever KRS was carved it was before 1700 AD. Stop spreading false information.


>
> > > It was found 1898.
>
> > So? It most certainly was NOT carved then, but at least 100 years
> > before that.
>
> > Fact: The stone was under a tree that had germinated and grown over
> > the stone.
> > Fact: That tree dated back to before any Europeans were in that
> > district.
> > Fact: The tree's age predates Ohman's arrival in the USA.
> > Fact: the runes were carved at least 100 years before the stone was
> > found.
> >
> > These are ALL established facts.
>
> They are /not/.

Per Rønne, you are definitely many years too late here. The geologic datas
are ALL established facts.
I take it that you forgotten that it's also been possible to compare with
the H Holland carved as a test in early 20th century. That H is at least 200
years later carved then the rest of the text.
Stop spreading your lies. You better do your homework.

Inger E


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
    ... >>> Europeans visited the area. ... >> Are you saying someone in Sweden/Norway brought the stone with them, ... it was carved in Minnesota. ... >> No not interested as there is no consensus on the item yet. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
    ... > Are you saying someone in Sweden/Norway brought the stone with them, ... it was carved in Minnesota. ... The stone was under a tree that had germinated and grown over ... There seem to be consensus amongst the experts. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
    ... > Europeans visited the area. ... Are you saying someone in Sweden/Norway brought the stone with them, ... The stone was under a tree that had germinated and grown over ... subscribers - alternately fall victim to a worm. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Illness brought down early human rival:Neanderthal
    ... A similar number of savannah humans starting with Erectus have been identified which are also extinct. ... There is no apparent combat edge between the basic stone ax and the work of art stone ax. ... They would certainly have moved inland as best weather conditions and glaciers permitted. ... What they do have is an unending supply of Europeans entering the country and moving west to take it from the Amerinds. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
    ... and it would have eaten into the stone. ... >> his estimate of age of last glacial movement in the area was ... for the KRS tree, based on ring counts from other similar trees. ... The annual rings of growth on these sections can be counted as ...
    (sci.archaeology)
Loading