Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press


"Per Rønne" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:1gxa6uv.161s0mu13unfscN%spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> IEJ <Iejohansson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Per Rønne, you are definitely many years too late here. The geologic
datas
> > are ALL established facts.
>
> The stone has been cleaned in a way so that it is impossible to say when
> the runes were maded. Forthermore, what has been said about the roots of
> the tree isn't possible to verify either.

Two false assumptions. You might have heard those from someone but
definitely not from someone who knows what he or she is talking about.
First yes the stone has been cleaned but no it's not impossible to say the
lowest age of the runes. That's very easily detected in the tests. Which you
also would have known had you read the results of all the tests. they are at
least made before 1700 AD.
Which directly exclude a 19th century assumption.
>
> Simply put, the "proofs" are even weaker than the "proofs" for the way
> Joseph Smith is said to have found Mormon's Book.

Sorry Per Erik,
I can't help that you aren't among those who have information enough for you
to realise that your lines aren't correct at all. I don't know everything
but what I do know is that the Kensington Runestone either was carved in
1362 or in 1521/22. The more facts that are up on the table the more the
former date seems likely than the later. The most interesting artifacts in
relation to the former date never been discussed in this group. Might be
within a short time depending on what's in Wolter's and Nielsen's book.
In the meantime I will give you one advice: please look more carefully on
the runes carved on stones and wood dating to 1200-1520's. The true
naysayers missed that one of their 'strongest' argument regarding the
Kensington Runes falls down as a baloon hit by a sharp edge had they only
done their homework.

Inger E

> --
> Per Erik Rønne


.

Relevant Pages

  • Continuing progress with the Kensington Rune Stone
    ... With each new test, there is more proof that the stone, unearthed in ... performed on the Kensington Runestone in October of 2008. ... the 3D imaging project. ... The new grooves and punches vastly increase the number of dotted runes ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Hooked X Runes and where they have been found.
    ... It was found on the Narragansett, Rhode Island inscription stone ... if the Larsson runes trace their roots to some ... inscription and in others discovered in North America (Spirit Pond, ... in this news group over the 'dotted-X'. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
    ... >>>message is identical to the message plainly inscribed on the stone, ... >>>presumably available to anyone who could read the runes. ... it is amazing that someone could allege that the dots on the KRS ... >No. I'm arguing from the fact that the KRS was inspected by Holand ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Hooked X Runes and where they have been found.
    ... if the Larsson runes trace their roots to some ... Narragansett inscription stone, or the astrolab or Rosslyn chapel. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
    ... I terms of facts shooting, ... do with bad routes with trip times that exceed the context of ... the stone, or with Templar crosses in gotlandia. ...
    (sci.archaeology)