Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press

IEJ wrote:

<snip>

And btw - Wikipedia changed their Swedish page 17th March this year and the
article which refered to the so called Larson papers is now gone....
http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kensingtonstenen


	The English version still has the Larsson material.

I'd be interested to know how that material was removed from the Swedish version, why and by whom. Could it have been Inger, and/or her cohorts? Might a kind Swedish reader check the discussion on that page?

<snip>
--
Tom McDonald
http://ahwhatdoiknow.blogspot.com/
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Feudalism
    ... translations to me by email. ... I can confirm that Inger has sent me a Swedish version of the first ... When I learnt it as a child the 'sumir' refered to persons who were wise ...
    (soc.history.medieval)
  • Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
    ... Alan Crozier wrote: ... Swedish version, why and by whom. ... Could it have been Inger, ... colonists in the USA say that they ran into 'white Indians' who became ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Varnhem excavation
    ... The purpose of your post was not very clear to me, ... and that most people don't speak Swedish. ... English and that the language in this forum is English. ... my concern for Inger and her thoughts about Gothic grandeur, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Hey little schoolgirl
    ... >> Inger E.Johansson wrote: ... >>> is it because I put Swedish authorities on to ... >>> real personal attacks ... or if I am the wrong Peter. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Whale steak
    ... Tom McDonald wrote: ... head. ... Swedish medel- in compound words can ... Inger did not so specify. ...
    (sci.archaeology)