Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Kjetil Rå Hauge <k.r.hauge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 13:14:19 +0200
On 28-05-05 23:13, in article T95me.138683$dP1.488335@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "IEJ"
<Iejohansson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But that's not all the
> tithes collected from the three dioceses under Gardar See that still were
> active in 1358-1362 has one 'name' in contemporary Norwegian church
> documents and annals: Tiundetaka.
This is a blat--, sorry, patent untruth, proven as such
(<http://tinyurl.com/42v4b>), but presented here for the umpteenth time
against better knowledge.
.
- References:
- Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Kjetil Rå Hauge
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alaca
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: IEJ
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: IEJ
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: IEJ
- Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Prev by Date: Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Next by Date: Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Previous by thread: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by thread: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Index(es):
Loading