Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 09:56:25 -0500
Alan Crozier wrote:
"Tom McDonald" <tmcdonald2672@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:Qj7me.726$HN1.111@xxxxxxxxxxx
IEJ wrote:
<snip>
And btw - Wikipedia changed their Swedish page 17th March this year and
the
article which refered to the so called Larson papers is now gone.... http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kensingtonstenen
The English version still has the Larsson material.
I'd be interested to know how that material was removed from the Swedish version, why and by whom. Could it have been Inger, and/or her cohorts? Might a kind Swedish reader check the discussion on that page?
I can's see any trace of either the presence or the removal of any reference to the Larsson runes. What I do see is the closing sentence:
"There are fantasies that the vanished Greenlanders went to North America and were assimilated with the aboriginal population, since legends from colonists in the USA say that they ran into 'white Indians' who became extinct as a result of a smallpox epidemic at the start of the 19th century."
Strange (but far from unusual) that Inger should refer to a site that does not support her views.
Alan
Thanks.
-- Tom McDonald http://ahwhatdoiknow.blogspot.com/ .
- References:
- Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Kjetil Rå Hauge
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alaca
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: IEJ
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: IEJ
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: IEJ
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alan Crozier
- Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Prev by Date: Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Next by Date: Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Previous by thread: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by thread: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|