Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)

Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> says in
news:cpqk919grm7rpgsshetksmghvqlan08ogu@xxxxxxx:

>>There are people and there are times. She is arguing Norwegian
>>and Swede after 1350, not Norse during the 11th century.
>
> You seem to be equating Norse with Viking. They are not the same
> thing.

The Viking period ended at the end of the 10th century. The
greenlanders were christianized thereafter and would have been Norse.
The swedish state with recognized borders did not begin until 1323,
however a partial definition was in place by the 12th century. Prior
to that people would have been informally called Swedes if they were
from eastern trading portion of the viking world, prior to 1323 there
was a contested claim over finland, so at that time the Swedish state
would have been Swedo-finnic.

>>I certainly do. This groups is polluted with off-topic
>>alternative archaeology because of the belief of one or two
>>people.
>
> Either you have your tongue in your cheek or you are misguided.

Me?

>>>>I see so that is the license to play loosely with the facts.
>>>
>>> So,you consider that she plays looseley with the facts is
>>> grounds to call her a racist?
>>
>>Playing loosely with facts can be an indication of many things,
>>in this case her statement of 'play homage to me' ...
>
> "play homage to me"?

> Inger never said that. I've searched both

' and ' indicate a paraphrasing. The first time you've seen
paraphrasing marks. She was in essence implying that a person was
inadequate if they could not pay homage to her 'forthcoming' facts of
evidence. 'Pay homage to my people' means 'pay homage to me'.
Looks like we are back to the obfuscating Eric. Eric, you know damn
well what I mean, you have no need to play games, your offense at the
racism claim is a actually an attempt to defend her agenda from the
reality of her critics, true of false. Playing loosely with the facts
as you know she has been doing, might be explained by ignorance, but
she has so many times pulled out bovine excrement and wanted someone
else to do the homework, 95% of these so-called links between canada
and the NE US are utter brain farts. And the excuses.
Truth or not, do you believe all her excuses? How about 50%, 25%.
And if you don't believe them how can you not see deliberacy. The so
called fauna picking, again one error, fine, but she has brought up a
half dozen animals and claimed these connect old world and new world
via the Norse. You be the judge, how many of these connections is a
solid link. So, therefore, consider whether or not this is deliberate
or just an inability to learn from past mistakes. Shall we go through
all the flora and fauna. Kettles, Clams, Horses, . . . . . . Let us
go through the Archaeology, the so called new studies, new native
american sites for Norse, all the reports that are supposed to be now
published or aired, where are they, how come none have appeared.
And let us not consider how many threads she started went in the
direction of false accusations, sex mail, viruses, claims about
supreme knowledge of the internett, etc. Certainly there is no
deliberacy there on diverting the discussion.


> I stopped responding to that article right then.

I see, but you continued responding to the follow-up. I suggest you
stop, I have predicted about 2/3rds of your last few replies, also
what you have avoided responding to. You are testing for a weakness
in my argument and avoiding the general argument being made. Here is
the chessboard, you have only a few pieces left. I will allow you to
see those two moves.

'Don't put off to malice that which can be explained by stupidity'

So which is it malice (bigotry) or stupidity, if you say its simple
ignorance, I should note that racisms definition has no exemptions
for ignorance, ignorance is always presumed. Your argument would then
include and exclusion for the fact there is a pathology associated
with the excuses and that the reintroduction of failed arguments is
caused by some kind of dementia. I should also note that as we began
making web pages of the discussion of some 'lines' the quadriannual
repetition of some topics stopped, mnemonic device?

Wouldn't you rather plonk me? :^).

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
    ... not Norse during the 11th century. ... 'Pay homage to my people' means 'pay homage to me'. ... >ignorance, I should note that racisms definition has no exemptions ... Eric Stevens ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Alaska on Ancient maps
    ... >>confidence about facts. ... Whereas you want to stretch probability ... >>boatload of Norse made it to this extreme or that, ... >>stands up for even the ragtag events. ...
    (sci.archaeology)