Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press

From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 21:14:48 +1200

On Mon, 30 May 2005 10:48:22 +0200, spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Per
Rønne) wrote:

>IEJ <Iejohansson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> that's not true. If you exclude the linguists the facts are accepted also by
>> those who doesn't believe the runestone to be from 1362 but made between
>> 1500 and 1700 AD.
>
>But most experts think the stone was made in the late 1800s ...

How about a few names.

Eric Stevens

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
  - From: Per Rønne

References:
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
  - From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
  - From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
  - From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
  - From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
  - From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
  - From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
  - From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
  - From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
  - From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
  - From: IEJ
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
  - From: Per Rønne

Prev by Date: Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
Next by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
Previous by thread: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
Next by thread: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
... If you exclude the linguists the facts are accepted also by ... > those who doesn't believe the runestone to be from 1362 but made between ...
(sci.archaeology)
Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
... Eric Stevens wrote: ... If you exclude the linguists the facts are accepted ...
(sci.archaeology)
Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
... If you exclude the linguists the facts are accepted ... definitly not a majority of ... which applies also to your tiny number of geologists. ...
(sci.archaeology)
Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
... If you exclude the linguists the facts are accepted ... definitly not a majority of ... when it comes to scholars of History. ...
(sci.archaeology)
Re: Car down
... This is a 'must exclude" ... I think the meme-like hatred of Wales displayed here rather boring. ... Me too, but let's not let facts get in the way of a stereotype, eh? ... Welsh" to "The English". ...
(uk.rec.motorcycles)