Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Philip Deitiker <Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 06:48:40 GMT
"hyperoglyphe" <hyperoglyphe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says in
news:429c0482$0$5105$5a62ac22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> It must be about time to slide back into the VM groove.
Ken is still here, we haven't left.
You know what we haven't seen in a long time is a fat out discussion
about the Newport Tower. Let us not forget mooring holes on SE US
rivers. And what about the viking garmetry found in canada.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sciarchauxilliary/files/Controversies/
Beardmore.rtf
http://f5.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/YP2bQink-Eycd29GOxWBWaPCJxUu4-
dIyfEtMm1bjGuUvruLfTU5X-
3APyxOPuUrCYd3IXdEWPkYmQSfjlFVglppuf72O2tA/Controversies/NewPortTower
..rtf
Yeah, I mean Viva Norumbergeria! Who wants to count corpses in
Greenland.
--
Philip
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
____Groups_____
Mol Anthro http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DNAanthro/
Pal Anthro http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Paleoanthro/
Arch. Aux http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sciarchauxilliary/
Gliadin Sci http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/GliadinScience/
____Sites_____
Mol. Evol. Hominids http://home.att.net/~DNAPaleoAnth/
Evol. of Xchrom. http://home.att.net/~DNAPaleoAnth/xlinked.htm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: george
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Alaca
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- References:
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: IEJ
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: IEJ
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: IEJ
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: hyperoglyphe
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: george
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: hyperoglyphe
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Prev by Date: Re: More thoughts.
- Next by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Previous by thread: Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Next by thread: Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|