Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: "hyperoglyphe" <hyperoglyphe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 14:30:17 +0800
"george" <gblack@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1117506106.497652.263320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>hyperoglyphe wrote:
>> "IEJ" <Iejohansson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:AcMme.138947$dP1.489136@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> > "Eric Stevens" <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
>> > news:32vm91lh0n6btaui52str87javcgg1k93v@xxxxxxxxxx
>> [...]
>> >> >and the same hat. But we aren't in a hat. There are and have always
>> >> >been
>> >> >very strong borders between our different groups. Skane has belonged
>> >> >to
>> >> >Sweden since mid 1600's but many Skåningar as well as many here
>> >> >doesn't
>> > look
>> >> >upon them as Swedes.
>> >>
>> >> But in the english world we tend to look on them all as norse.
>> >
>> > Well what I was trying to tell you in the English speaking world was
>> > that
>> > you use this in a wrong way. It's like saying that NZ was Aussie.
>> >
>> Almost spot on. Australia is known as West New Zealand. The Western Isle
>> home to about 32% of New Zealand's pupulation.
>>
>So thats where our pups go ? :-)
and your fush and your chups... Australian Bureau of Statistics has nearly
500,000 1st and 2nd generation Kiwis residing in Oz.
>
>I'm wondering how they have a 1200 mile gap beween each of those
>'Norse' countries.
>Silly woman !
Mad? possibly. But certainly not silly at all. The maelstrom created by her
"offbeat" interpretations really would make the gentle reader think there
was something to all this. The method works.
It is a simple troll trick and another excuse to link this wonderful site:
www.geocities.com/linchpin_university/index.html
Not many come close. That teenage boy probably impersonating Seepo Renforz
does a good job- his dad must be a real idiot.
Keep in mind also that the KRS post count for May 2005 has now exceeded
1000.
It must be about time to slide back into the VM groove.
Dave
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- References:
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: IEJ
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: IEJ
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: IEJ
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: hyperoglyphe
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: george
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Prev by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Previous by thread: Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Next by thread: Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Index(es):
Loading