Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Philip Deitiker <Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 20:29:45 GMT
Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> says in
news:vkbo91lftidr8mu03u7sn38329o9qpduta@xxxxxxx:
> On Tue, 31 May 2005 14:30:17 +0800, "hyperoglyphe"
> <hyperoglyphe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>"george" <gblack@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:1117506106.497652.263320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>hyperoglyphe wrote:
>>>> "IEJ" <Iejohansson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> news:AcMme.138947$dP1.489136@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> >
>>>> > "Eric Stevens" <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
>>>> > news:32vm91lh0n6btaui52str87javcgg1k93v@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> [...]
>>>> >> >and the same hat. But we aren't in a hat. There are and
>>>> >> >have always been
>>>> >> >very strong borders between our different groups. Skane
>>>> >> >has belonged to
>>>> >> >Sweden since mid 1600's but many Skåningar as well as
>>>> >> >many here doesn't
>>>> > look
>>>> >> >upon them as Swedes.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> But in the english world we tend to look on them all as
>>>> >> norse.
>>>> >
>>>> > Well what I was trying to tell you in the English speaking
>>>> > world was that
>>>> > you use this in a wrong way. It's like saying that NZ was
>>>> > Aussie.
>>>> >
>>>> Almost spot on. Australia is known as West New Zealand. The
>>>> Western Isle home to about 32% of New Zealand's pupulation.
>>>>
>>>So thats where our pups go ? :-)
>>
>>and your fush and your chups... Australian Bureau of Statistics
>>has nearly 500,000 1st and 2nd generation Kiwis residing in Oz.
>
> Do you remember what the late Sir Robert Muldoon said about the
> mass emigration of NZrs to Australia? "It improves the IQ of
> both countries".
Ouch! Call Wilson.
.
- References:
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: IEJ
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: IEJ
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: IEJ
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: hyperoglyphe
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: george
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: hyperoglyphe
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Prev by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by Date: Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Previous by thread: Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Next by thread: Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Index(es):