Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Philip Deitiker <Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 13:26:28 GMT
"Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxxxxx> says in
news:429daa7f$0$78024$dbd41001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>> Sorry Per Erik,
>> the absolute minimum age when the rune was carved has in
>> geologic testings been shown to be 1700 AD. Not younger you
>> know.
>
> Maybe you can give us a source for that?
Wolter.
.
- References:
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: IEJ
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alaca
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Prev by Date: Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Next by Date: Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Previous by thread: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by thread: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Index(es):
Loading