Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Per Rønne)
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 19:19:24 +0200
<nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It's not quite like that. If you look through an encyclopedia you can find
> errors and that's hardly surprising as it isn't written by a huge team of
> experts in all the fields it covers, it is written by a few people who, while
> educated, aren't experts in any fields.
I've just looked through the authors of the Great Danish Encyclopædia. I
get 3740 authors. All of them experts in their area.
I'm sure the number of authors and proofreaders isn't smaller for the
Encyclopædia Britannica.
--
Per Erik Rønne
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: nospam
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- References:
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: nospam
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Prev by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by Date: Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Previous by thread: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by thread: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading