Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press

Apparently on date Wed, 1 Jun 2005 19:19:24 +0200, spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Per Rønne) said:

><nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> It's not quite like that. If you look through an encyclopedia you can find
>> errors and that's hardly surprising as it isn't written by a huge team of
>> experts in all the fields it covers, it is written by a few people who, while
>> educated, aren't experts in any fields.
>
>I've just looked through the authors of the Great Danish Encyclopædia. I
>get 3740 authors. All of them experts in their area.
>
>I'm sure the number of authors and proofreaders isn't smaller for the
>Encyclopædia Britannica.

Well maybe so, but you could then produce the expert names for the KRS
disputants, no?

I wouldn't go down that route, but feel free.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
    ... If you look through an encyclopedia you can find ... > errors and that's hardly surprising as it isn't written by a huge team of ... Per Erik Rønne ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Counting Problem
    ... Even for an n-cube there is no formula ... at the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences). ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.puzzles)
  • Re: Iraq A Democracy...
    ... Grab an encyclopedia and look up the Vichy Government for a historical ... Prev by Date: ...
    (alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots)
  • Re: Hello, im back
    ... > Sorry to hear about your problems with the United Kennel Club. ... But that's hardly surprising, in view of the OP's previous boasts of ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.rec.climbing)
  • Re: number sequence
    ... Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences at albooks.com. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
Loading