Re: Free Masons history
- From: "Alan Crozier" <name1.name2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 13:52:42 GMT
"Martin Edwards" <buzzard554@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d7mml0$bd6$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> IEJ wrote:
> > It's also from this group the Mason's history origin.
> > But that's an other story.
> >
> > Inger E
>
> Balls. The Masons as known today came into being in the eighteenth
> century. They have *no* organic links with the medieval stonemasons,
> the Knights Templar or my illustrious ancestor Fred Edwards the
> fishmonger. The fact that they subsequently made up such connections,
> along with relevant degrees and rituals, is beside the point. After
> all, the Roman bishopric thinks it was instituted by a failed Judean
rebel.
The really interesting thing is how the Franciscan Order could have existed
before Saint Francis. I suppose we'll have to wait and judge the evidence
before we dismiss the idea.
Alan
--
Alan Crozier
Lund
Sweden
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Free Masons history
- From: Alaca
- Re: Free Masons history
- References:
- Re: Free Masons history
- From: Thomas Zahr
- Re: Free Masons history
- From: IEJ
- Re: Free Masons history
- From: Martin Edwards
- Re: Free Masons history
- Prev by Date: Re: True history and myths told by naysayers
- Next by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Previous by thread: Re: Free Masons history
- Next by thread: Re: Free Masons history
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading