Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press


"Eric Stevens" <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:bclt91hopuss4vl7cn5scksktqeopeidim@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 05:05:57 GMT, Philip Deitiker
> <Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> says in
>>news:8v2t911i82ckhihe21dov816usoo66sfne@xxxxxxx:
>>
>>> On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 04:15:38 GMT, Philip Deitiker
>>> <Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> says in
>>>>news:gsqs911macdh0tndronoqcs87467pm7412@xxxxxxx:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 01:12:40 GMT, Philip Deitiker
>>>>> <Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> says in
>>>>>>news:9n6s915sqa9b5nh8j0mu3q9k4u43rkhn33@xxxxxxx:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At least 200 years before discovery according to Wolters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>WHo believes Wolters?
>>>>>
>>>>> What's belief got to do with science?
>>>>
>>>>For one, if I don't believe he did good work, then I don't
>>>>believe its good science. Everything in the universe is a
>>>>perception to the human mind, science is also.
>>>>
>>> True, but at this stage you don't really know a damned thing
>>> about what he did
>>
>>Very true, its all damned heresay from you. lol.
>>
>>>, which is why belief is irrelevant at this
>>> stage.
>>
>>Which is why peer review is more important.
>
> That's good. You don't need to find out for yourself. You don't need
> to make up your mind. But if some one who impresses you gives the seal
> of approval, then you will accept it.
>
> Yeah, right.

In your case, it is "right", doubled and redoubled. Hence your worship at
the altar of Wolters.

>
>>And until it is done on
>>his RM report or his new book, I am not enclined to believe anything.
>>Like I said who believes Wolters, he publishes a book in a museum, is
>>majically disappears, and now there is supposed to be a new book
>>coming out, but its not coming out, or it maybe coming out, or it was
>>coming out last june, or september.
>>
>>At some point in time someone will publish this material in a peer
>>reviewed journal, then I might take half a look, and if they don't I
>>am not enclined to believe jack ____.
>>
>
>
>
>
> Eric Stevens

Steve
--
The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either. This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
>


.

Loading