Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press



Per Rønne wrote:
>
> <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Apparently on date Wed, 1 Jun 2005 19:19:24 +0200, spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > (Per Rønne) said:
> >
> > ><nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >> It's not quite like that. If you look through an encyclopedia you can find
> > >> errors and that's hardly surprising as it isn't written by a huge team of
> > >> experts in all the fields it covers, it is written by a few people who,
> > >> ewhile ducated, aren't experts in any fields.
> > >
> > >I've just looked through the authors of the Great Danish Encyclopædia. I
> > >get 3740 authors. All of them experts in their area.
> > >
> > >I'm sure the number of authors and proofreaders isn't smaller for the
> > >Encyclopædia Britannica.
> >
> > Well maybe so, but you could then produce the expert names for the KRS
> > disputants, no?
> >
> > I wouldn't go down that route, but feel free.
>
> The author of the article in the Great Danish Encyclopædia is signed
> "MSto" which means that the author is Marie Stoklund who specializes in
> archaeology and language. She is described as a museum inspector and MA.
> And as a subject adviser and investigator {"fagkonsulent og gransker"}.

So please produce the study of the KRS by this "Marie Stoklund" as
evidence of the claims you make using her as your "authority".

Oh, a "museum inspector" is that something like a "health inspector",
or a "ticket inspector" on the busses?

--
http://tinyurl.com/al225
http://tinyurl.com/alznw
.

Loading