Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Per Rønne)
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 08:36:55 +0200
Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 05:44:07 +0200, spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Per
> Rønne) wrote:
>
> >Seppo Renfors <Renfors@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> So please produce the study of the KRS by this "Marie Stoklund" as
> >> evidence of the claims you make using her as your "authority".
> >
> >As I said, articles are proofread by others. And with the exception of a
> >few "believers", everybody knows that the stone is not from 1362. But of
> >course it is possible that it isn't a fake - it is possible that part of
> >the letter that means '8' is missing and that 1862 is consequently read
> >as 1362.
>
> I sugest you study the pentadic numbers used on the KRS before you
> make that claim again. It's nonsense.
I think this is sufficient:
Message-ID <429daa80$0$78024$dbd41001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Per Erik Rønne
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- References:
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: nospam
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: nospam
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Per Rønne
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Prev by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by Date: Linchpin University founded by Inger herself?
- Previous by thread: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by thread: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|