Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: "Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:40:46 +0200
IEJ wrote: iuSne.26286$d5.177005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
The tree and the rootmarks have nothing to do with the age of the stone as runestone.
-- P.A.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- References:
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Daryl Krupa
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Daryl Krupa
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: IEJ
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Prev by Date: Re: Linchpin University founded by Inger herself?
- Next by Date: Re: True history and myths told by naysayers
- Previous by thread: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by thread: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Index(es):
Loading
