Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press

On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:40:46 +0200, "Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>IEJ wrote: iuSne.26286$d5.177005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>
>
>The tree and the rootmarks have nothing to
>do with the age of the stone as runestone.

The age of the root marks does set a minimum age for the carving of
the stone.



Eric Stevens

.

Relevant Pages

  • ATLANTIS and CATACLYSM...
    ... civilization, the Antediluvian Age. ... and the last of the great mountains falls ... meters wide atop the flattened peak, the walls rising fifteen meters ... of reinforced stone rising forty meters above the leveled peak, ...
    (rec.games.frp.gurps)
  • Re: Far-north Cairns in North America
    ... >> ages of above ground stone structures are defined without a single ... but a heavily researched and tested age of another isn't ... >> acceptance of the age of stone? ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
    ... >>> his estimate of age of last glacial movement in the area was ... >>> The roots were not said to be wrapped around the stone, ... >for the KRS tree, based on ring counts from other similar trees. ... > annual rings; ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
    ... do with the age of the stone as runestone. ... uncritically accept that the root marks we see were formed ab ... full-tilt-boogie, stale, rancid and smelly KRS ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
    ... do with the age of the stone as runestone. ... the root marks do not set a minimum age for the carving of the KRS if the marks can be formed in a matter of years. ...
    (sci.archaeology)