Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press

On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 10:46:51 +0200, "Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>David Johnson wrote:
>Xns966AE002955BCtrolleyfanearthlinkn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>
>
>> Or, IOW, the whole tree root digression is pointless, even by the
>> rather low standards of KRS discussions...
>>
>> David
>
>That is correct.
>It was only relevant in the search for a perpetrator.

A parallel line of enquiry relates as to when it was perpetrated. This
bears directly on the question of the authenticity of the KRS.




Eric Stevens

.

Relevant Pages