Re: True history and myths told by naysayers
- From: "IEJ" <Iejohansson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 10:35:05 GMT
"Eric Stevens" <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:eug5a1lt9j4lhar14br8pjlfjnkshaqrru@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 11:36:54 GMT, Philip Deitiker
> <Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> says in
> >news:lhrv919q4kbt9vikdn22dv8p5o55114138@xxxxxxx:
> >
> >> On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 04:26:26 GMT, Philip Deitiker
> >> <Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> says in
> >>>news:puqu911dv2q049vrvt1dh529v44d8bh5cf@xxxxxxx:
> >>>
> >>>> On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:24:31 GMT,
> >>>> nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Apparently on date Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:26:59 GMT, "IEJ"
> >>>>><Iejohansson@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>to nospam,
> >>>>>>while I agree upon many things you write, you seem to forget
> >>>>>>or maybe not know that it's not Scandinavism we who put
> >>>>>>forward KRS are talking about and/or in view of, it's the
> >>>>>>true story we are after no matter which.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I'm not against seeking truth but what happens in the
> >>>>>newsgroup is massively dominated by circular debates about a
> >>>>>very few, Norse-related controversies.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>As for the KRS, it could be a genuine Norse artifact and it
> >>>>>could be a fake. Usenet discussions don't really affect that
> >>>>>and it's really a matter of what people think based on the
> >>>>>evidence they've seen.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>For many hundred years Columbus has been the one to be
> >>>>>>presented as the 'finder', explorer etc of America. That's
> >>>>>>not true.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Well he did find America at a time that nobody else in Europe
> >>>>>appeared to know it was there.
> >>>>
> >>>> Nobody in europe except the Basques, the English, the Norse
> >>>> and probably the French. Possibly even the cities of the Hanse
> >>>> ports.
> >>>
> >>>Atta boy Eric, we can always count on you to bring up the rear.
> >>>Some one give three toots for Eric. You also forgot to mention
> >>>king Arthur's men, the pharoahs, the chinese, the solomon
> >>>islanders, and last but not least the wee fairy people who hide
> >>>behind rocks.
> >>
> >> Unlike you, I am citing the people for whom there is evidence.
> >
> >Which cannot be presented here for odd reason and which
> >has not been reviewed in peer-reviewed scientific journals or books.
>
> This sounds like an admission by you that you are totally unaware of
> the evidence. Why should I be surprised?
> >
> >>>It was the cabal I tell you, the tin cabal.
> >>
> >> It mainly was the secret of where the fish were coming from, and
> >> the furs.
> >
> >I can help you out there. Fish, ...shshhhh, don't tell anyone, come
> >from water. Furs, this is super top secret, come from furry critters.
> >We have been trying to keep this secret, but for some reason many
> >folk who have this affliction called 'common sense' keep figuring it
> >out.
>
> I think you should go back under your bridge.
> >
> >> There are records pointing to pre-Columbian contact
> >> contact with South Ameria by the Portuguese and there are
> >> records of what may be pre-Columbian imports of a south american
> >> wood in france.
> >
> >And these records are reviewed where?
Guess Philip never understood that Prime Sources from Medieval Age don't
need reviews they stand on their own feet!
> >
> >> I can't remember the details but I have them somewhere.
> >
> >That is Ingerish for 'I don't have a publication that supports this
> >that I would present to this group'. Would you like to select a more
> >appropriate excuse from the Ingerlist.
Never excused that I don't like throwing pearls to swine and some here are
acting like swine thus they don't deserve to have all things served on
silver plates!
>
> See my response to Doug re Brasil wood.
> >
> >> The same wood is believed to have been used for
> >> panelling in the original construction of the Louvre in Paris.
> >> Records are hazy from those days but there are many many
> >> pointers.
> >
> >Ah-huh. Hazy records that point to 'evidence' that is in great
> >abundance.
> >
> >>>> The Irish may have known but forgotten the truth at the
> >>>> heart of the matter.
> >>>
> >>>Irish Whiskey. That and the mind altering drugs of the tin cabal
> >>>(also know as Tinkerbell to the Irish).
> >>
> >> Take your pills.
> >
> >The cabal has them. They also seem to have gotten yours.
>
> Eric Stevens
>
Inger E
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: True history and myths told by naysayers
- From: hyperoglyphe
- Re: True history and myths told by naysayers
- From: t(nospam)kavanagh
- Re: True history and myths told by naysayers
- From: Alaca
- Re: True history and myths told by naysayers
- References:
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: nospam
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: nospam
- True history and myths told by naysayers
- From: IEJ
- Re: True history and myths told by naysayers
- From: nospam
- Re: True history and myths told by naysayers
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: True history and myths told by naysayers
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: True history and myths told by naysayers
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: True history and myths told by naysayers
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: True history and myths told by naysayers
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Prev by Date: Re: Mercator Globes on-line
- Next by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Previous by thread: Re: True history and myths told by naysayers
- Next by thread: Re: True history and myths told by naysayers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|