Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press



IEJ wrote:  jIVoe.26576$d5.177482@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> "Eric Stevens" skrev

Wrong, an 8 would have stood out, a 6 with a missing chip would fit
perfectly. The stone, BTW, has been retouched.

Not that part and not all of the stone! That's one of the things that's been established and accepted by all who studied it no matter what they believe re. the stone's age.


    "The last line of the inscription was cut through a
    portion of the cement surrounding the base, and the
    letters and figures cannot be clearly distinguised, the
    cement having been chipped away."
    (Prof. Curme, 1899)
    "This is the only mention of cement that I have found.
    Perhaps this is a mistake for the calcite deposits on
    the stone (see Winchell below) which show a greater
    amount of weathering than the greaywacke of the
    stone." (Michael Zalar)

--
- Peter Alaca - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -



.



Relevant Pages

  • ATLANTIS and CATACLYSM...
    ... civilization, the Antediluvian Age. ... and the last of the great mountains falls ... meters wide atop the flattened peak, the walls rising fifteen meters ... of reinforced stone rising forty meters above the leveled peak, ...
    (rec.games.frp.gurps)
  • Re: Far-north Cairns in North America
    ... >> ages of above ground stone structures are defined without a single ... but a heavily researched and tested age of another isn't ... >> acceptance of the age of stone? ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
    ... >>> his estimate of age of last glacial movement in the area was ... >>> The roots were not said to be wrapped around the stone, ... >for the KRS tree, based on ring counts from other similar trees. ... > annual rings; ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Jani + FLUFF
    ... but actually dates back to the Stone ... Age. ... Slightly daughter! ... Aww! ...
    (uk.religion.pagan)
  • Re: Far-north Cairns in North America
    ... > ages of above ground stone structures are defined without a single ... > object to being recognised as genuine. ... but a heavily researched and tested age of another isn't ... > acceptance of the age of stone? ...
    (sci.archaeology)

Quantcast