Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press

Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> says in
news:eo78a1tlelmm25cifc5t0lkhr4gjjv3qup@xxxxxxx:

> On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 08:13:44 GMT,
> nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>>Apparently on date Mon, 06 Jun 2005 13:11:24 +1200, Eric Stevens
>><eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>>
>>>On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 13:00:40 GMT, Philip Deitiker
>>><Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>The first and most important step
>>>>in almost any chemical extraction is to break the material up
>>>>into smaller pieces with greater surface area. Indeed if the
>>>>material is composed covelant polymer crosslinks then the
>>>>mechanical teasing results in the breakage of some of these
>>>>bonds. As I repeat, I have zero trust in Wolters methods.
>>>>Wolters science lives in the world of hype and vested
>>>>interest, not in peer-reviewed science journals. You, know,
>>>>Eric, the kind of hypy science that you and Inger find the
>>>>most insightful
>>>
>>>Bluster, bull-*** and personal attack. What's more, its clear
>>>you have not the faintest knowldge of the subject of your
>>>attack.
>>
>>That seems to be Philip's forte.
>>
> Sometimes Philip is good value but too often he is living up to
> his self-declared description of a newsgroup troll.

Po wittle Eric, running around and responding to all these
wittle critiques. Eric your reputation for contorting and white
washing the facts are notorious, that you should talk.

.

Quantcast