Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- From: "Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:12:13 +0200
Eric Stevens wrote: 6pcha1l78dibosdibc17klkga5ein26aau@xxxxxxx,
Philip Deitiker wrote:
Rather that argue around in circles with people who want to debate trivia rather than what constitutes a good argument I have decided to set this aside.
It's been pretty obvious that this is all you have wanted to do from the moment you first heard of the KRS.
What, starting a clean thread?
-- P.A.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- References:
- Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- From: Eric Stevens
- Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- Prev by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Previous by thread: Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- Next by thread: Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- Index(es):