Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:56:30 +1200
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:12:13 +0200, "Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Eric Stevens wrote: 6pcha1l78dibosdibc17klkga5ein26aau@xxxxxxx,
>> Philip Deitiker wrote:
>
>>> Rather that argue around in circles with people who want to debate
>>> trivia rather than what constitutes a good argument I have decided to
>>> set this aside.
>>
>> It's been pretty obvious that this is all you have wanted to do from
>> the moment you first heard of the KRS.
>
>What, starting a clean thread?
Set the KRS aside.
He's been agin it from the very first moment he heard of it. He
arrived in this newsgroup labelling anyone who didn't want to reject
it outright as 'KOOKS' or hyperdiffusionists.
Go back through the threads and you will find a consistent pattern of
bias and arguing from ignorance. What he calls 'trivia' are the facts
of the matter. You watch him now build a fact-free argument against
the KRS based on irrelevancies and what people haven't said.
Eric Stevens
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- From: Alaca
- Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- References:
- Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- From: Alaca
- Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- Prev by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Previous by thread: Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- Next by thread: Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
