Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- From: Philip Deitiker <Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 01:23:28 GMT
Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> says in
news:p6kha1t9fmuk6bhsr536sttfoaf8kmmsv0@xxxxxxx:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:12:13 +0200, "Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>>Eric Stevens wrote: 6pcha1l78dibosdibc17klkga5ein26aau@xxxxxxx,
>>> Philip Deitiker wrote:
>>
>>>> Rather that argue around in circles with people who want to
>>>> debate trivia rather than what constitutes a good argument I
>>>> have decided to set this aside.
>>>
>>> It's been pretty obvious that this is all you have wanted to
>>> do from the moment you first heard of the KRS.
>>
>>What, starting a clean thread?
>
> Set the KRS aside.
>
> He's been agin it from the very first moment he heard of it. He
> arrived in this newsgroup labelling anyone who didn't want to
> reject it outright as 'KOOKS' or hyperdiffusionists.
I was neutral to the KRS. I was calling people kooks because of the
style of their proofs for its authenticity. For example, proclaiming
that a deceased C.1362 organization carved the stone is a kooky idea.
> Go back through the threads and you will find a consistent
> pattern of bias and arguing from ignorance. What he calls
> 'trivia' are the facts of the matter.
Give me a break, they are bull***. You don't prove that the sun
exists by looking at the reflections of light off planets of distance
suns.
> You watch him now build a
> fact-free argument against the KRS based on irrelevancies and
> what people haven't said.
You can't seem to answer basic quetion and yet you claim to have the
firmest understanding of the facts.
1. Where did the stone core come from?
2. Who and where was it carved?
By who I mean what people.
Start there.
--
Philip
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
____Groups_____
Mol Anthro http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DNAanthro/
Pal Anthro http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Paleoanthro/
Arch. Aux http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sciarchauxilliary/
Gliadin Sci http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/GliadinScience/
____Sites_____
Mol. Evol. Hominids http://home.att.net/~DNAPaleoAnth/
Evol. of Xchrom. http://home.att.net/~DNAPaleoAnth/xlinked.htm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- References:
- Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- From: Alaca
- Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- From: Eric Stevens
- Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- Prev by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Previous by thread: Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- Next by thread: Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
- Index(es):