Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion

On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:57:27 GMT, Philip Deitiker
<Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> says in
>news:6pcha1l78dibosdibc17klkga5ein26aau@xxxxxxx:
>
>> On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 13:41:22 GMT, Philip Deitiker
>> <Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>Rather that argue around in circles with people who want to
>>>debate trivia rather than what constitutes a good argument I
>>>have decided to set this aside.
>>
>> It's been pretty obvious that this is all you have wanted to do
>> from the moment you first heard of the KRS.
>
>No, I don't want to argue your squink with you, since you seem unable
>to do anything but derail the argument into squink I need to reset it
>at its fundementals, IOW that which you don't want to discuss because
>it is to important to the argument.

You call giving you the facts 'squink'?

Thank you for helping to prove my point.



Eric Stevens

.

Relevant Pages