Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion



Philip Deitiker wrote:
>
> Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> says in
> news:p6kha1t9fmuk6bhsr536sttfoaf8kmmsv0@xxxxxxx:
>
[..]
> > He's been agin it from the very first moment he heard of it. He
> > arrived in this newsgroup labelling anyone who didn't want to
> > reject it outright as 'KOOKS' or hyperdiffusionists.
>
> I was neutral to the KRS. I was calling people kooks because of the
> style of their proofs for its authenticity. For example, proclaiming
> that a deceased C.1362 organization carved the stone is a kooky idea.

Trust the bottle washer to focus on something that most likely was a
tongue in cheek comment and NOT the serious study done on the stone by
Wolter - ie the age of the carving being at least 200 years old at the
time of finding the stone - the critical finding.

[..]

--
Criminal Tony Smith the stalker need not respond
http://tinyurl.com/al225
http://tinyurl.com/alznw
.