Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: "Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 15:19:31 +0200
Daryl Krupa wrote: 1118445086.584455.221590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Alaca wrote:<snip>Philip Deitiker wrote:
The flip side is that the region may have been a part of a manmade fire ecology zone.
Was burning then and there already used, or was it European influence?<snip>
Peter: Prescribed burns seem to have been a common tool for wildlife habitat management among many Native American groups. Here in Alberta, a ban on Native burning in the 1930s has led to a change in average age of tree stands and forest fire characteristics, (larger and more-intense forest fires than before the ban, and less browsing habitat for deer, moose, etc., and a drop in populations of wapiti and caribou) so in our case at least, European influence was antithetical to manmade fire ecology zones. Fire also seems to have had a strong role in suppressing poplar growth in fringe lands between forest and grassland (what we call "parkland"), so that some areas with good, dark grassland soils now support poplar stands (which tend to produce grey soils) since the incidence of fire has dropped to "almost never".
A site re: manmade fire ecology:
http://www.pc.gc.ca/pn-np/ab/elkisland/natcul/natcul1di_E.asp
- Daryl Krupa
Thank you. Since my question I know a lot more. I already gave in the thread {Some logic ...] a link to the great site of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/snas/index.html and I know now that wildfires were already common in pre-European times and that it was the most important natural disturbance. I also didn't know that it is still used in modern forrest/nature managent.
The consequence is that we can't be sure about
the structure of the vegetation on landscape level
in the 14th century Kensington area.
Here are some notes on the factor fire in different ecosystems from the DNR site.
Minnesota River prairie
Fire was the most common natural disturbance
before settlement. Fire suppression has allowed
woodlands to develop from what was originally
oak openings or brush prairies Red River prairie
Fire, drought, and annual flooding are important
Pine moraines & outwash plains
Fire occurred on a 10-40 year rotation within
much of the subsection, accounting for the
dominance by upland conifers and trembling
aspen-birch forests (Frissel 1973).
Aspen parklands
Fire was the most common natural disturbance
before settlement. Fire suppression has allowed
woodlands to develop from what was originally
oak openings or brush prairies (Wheeler et al.
1992).
Hardwood hills
Fire was important in oak savanna development. Agassiz lowlands
Fire occurred on the peatlands. Insect
infestations, such as spruce budworm probably
lead to fires. St. Louis moraines
Fire and windthrow were the most common
natural disturbances. Fire was an important
agent in maintaining fairly pure red and white
pine stands.
Coteau moraines
Fire and drought were the dominant causes of
natural disturbance. Fires were very common
before settlement, re-energizing the prairie
plant communities.
-- - Peter Alaca - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Daryl Krupa
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- References:
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: David Johnson
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Daryl Krupa
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: David Johnson
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alaca
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alaca
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: m_zalar@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alaca
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: m_zalar@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alaca
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Daryl Krupa
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Prev by Date: Re: Gotland crosses
- Next by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Previous by thread: Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- Next by thread: Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|