Re: Killing myth - Ohman - part 1



Alaca wrote:
> IEJ wrote: nUxqe.27010$d5.178821@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> > "Alaca" skrev...
> >> IEJ wrote:
>
> >>> It's incredible that some here still tries to put the myth of Ohman
> >>> as a stone mason man forward. Haven't they learnt anything at all
> >>> over the last years?
> >>>
> >>> as Michael Zalar correctly quoted Arthur:
> >>> "My father could not have possibly have carved the inscription. He
> >>> was never more than a fair stonemason. He did not even own
> >>> stonemason's chisels until considerably after 1898." (Arthur Ohman,
> >>> signed statement in Landesverk)
> >>> http://www.geocities.com/thetropics/island/3634/INTcritic.html
> >>>
> >>> No person can be called a stonemason if he hasn't WORKED as it.
> >>> Ohman never did here in Sweden and it wasn't until long after 1898
> >>> he ever did one thing which could be called even alike stonemason
> >>> work!
> >>>
> >>> Inger E
> >>
> >> Killing another 'myth': the correct link is
> >> http://www.geocities.com/thetropics/island/3634/roots5.htm
> >>
> >> And Inger, Ohman is not the myth, the KRS is.
>
> > Alaca,
> > your lines are as always your assumptions worth null, zero..
> > Kensington runestone was carved abefore 1700. Stop trying to take
> > pieces out of it's place and make them look in way they weren't
> > intended. The url I sent was the one where Michael Zalar took the
> > false assumptions and 'conclusions' made by BW and others up. THAT's
> > the important part no matter what you will make believe!
> >
> > Good Night. Learn how to do correct research and validation, then you
> > might deserve an answer before that none.
> >
> > Inger E
>
> Why are you so abusive?

She has an agenda to 'prove' that America was settled by Scandinavians
and no-one here is buying it..
>
> We are talking of Arthur Ohman's statement
> " My father could not have possibly carved the
> inscription. He was not ever more than a
> fair stonemason.
> He did not even own stonemason's chisels
> until considerably after 1898. "
>
>
> That quote is behind the link you gave, but the
> corrected link goes to the integral quoted
> statement to Landesverk dd sep 26, 1961.
> It is not a primary source, but it is better than
> the out of context quote you mentioned.

What? inger? misquote a tomato sauce to further her ends.
oh how we have fallen

> I think you still don't understand that a
> "'fair stonemason" /is/ a stonemason
> even without owning the tools.
> I can drive a car, but I don't possess one.
> I can sail a boat, but I don't possess one.
> I have learned how to shoot, but I dont have a gun.
> I can do magic tricks without high a hat or white rabit.
> I can ...
> My children have no idea of all the skills I have.
> .

One might expect that (like in todays building industry) itinerant
workers would use the tools common to the site...

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Merchandise harbor Greenland - killing a Myth
    ... > that Inger apparently doesn't recognize Herjolfsnes ... > the harbour becomes obvious and the article is interesting ... nase, nasa, nasja-, nasjam etc. with the meanings ... Peter Alaca - ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Getae were not Goths: linguistic evidence
    ... I have been abused namecalled and such by Alaca from day one he entered this ... >>> Alaca and Marian, ... >> Hey, Inger, leave Marian out of this! ... > I have cited much evidence and specific sources references. ...
    (soc.history.ancient)
  • Re: The Order of the Holy Grail former Re: Gotland crosses
    ... You may not like it Alaca, but the truth is there even then. ... Stop your stalking abusive attacks and learn how to do your homework. ... >> Templars cross - there is one and only one which have been accepted ... >> Inger E ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Wild kettle and oxen
    ... "Alaca" writes: ... >> constant arguing with Inger, a person who clearly has emotional and ... >> rationalization problems. ...
    (sci.archaeology)