Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press


"Eric Stevens" <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ocaka1t4fadmkfs31uf6moj9o3i8lbnflh@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 09:10:27 -0600, "Tedd Jacobs"
> <Jacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Eric Stevens" wrote...
>>> On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:41:14 -0600, "Tedd Jacobs"
>>> <Jacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Eric Stevens" wrote...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>something about the professional academic vs. the amrchair amature...
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not sure that I did but, if you wish to qualify as a professional
>>> academic, I suggest you learn to spell. :-)
>>
>>
>>la gente acepta los faltas de ortografía erróneos en vez de los éticas
>>desfavorable. es ' posible ' yo podría ser incorrecto, aunque dudo que es
>>'
>>probable '.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>et tu nivalis?
>>
>>
> Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Fusce
> egestas eros a metus. Donec ullamcorper orci et risus. Aliquam urna
> odio, vestibulum vel, scelerisque sit amet, aliquam ac, justo. Aliquam
> erat volutpat. Morbi dignissim hendrerit orci. Nunc lorem tortor,
> blandit a, mattis sit amet, tempor sit amet, sapien. Curabitur luctus.

neque porro quisquam est qui imprudentium ipsum quia inscientia sit amet,
consectetur, adipisci velit...


it is insult enough to suggest another persons hinderance of discovery, be
it in the search for truth or for fact. it was a line not to be crossed to
bring into question your own ethical stance through insinuation that you
yourself could interfere with that quest for knowledge. hence i have grown
sorely disappointed with you, and with our past conversations to think yours
was an act not for advancement of knowledge or discussion, but for malice.


.

Relevant Pages