Re: Gotland crosses
- From: nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 01:54:55 GMT
Apparently on date Sat, 11 Jun 2005 12:15:22 GMT, "cgjt" <cgjt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
said:
>
>"IEJ" <Iejohansson@xxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
>news:i2yqe.27016$d5.178723@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>snip
>
>>
>> They are real. So are the Templar's cross on a house in Östergötland.
>
>Now you have a great opportunity to proove that you are right.
>Within 3 hours I can have a image avaible on the web if you
>just give a location for the house you claim have this cross.
I too would like to see this. Obviously, if the house is real and has this
feature on public display, this can be nothing more than a trivial declaration
of a true fact.
The house itself need not be kept a closely guarded secret to protect a
manuscript / etc / secret scholarship if it is a public object.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gotland crosses
- From: cgjt
- Re: Gotland crosses
- References:
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Gotland crosses
- From: Doug Weller
- Re: Gotland crosses
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Gotland crosses
- From: IEJ
- Re: Gotland crosses
- From: cgjt
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Prev by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Previous by thread: Re: Gotland crosses
- Next by thread: Re: Gotland crosses
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|