Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: kenney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 05:23:53 -0500
In article <QSZqe.8706$rt3.7801@xxxxxxxx>,
tmcdonald2672@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Tom McDonald) wrote:
> I also read online an article that suggested the Nazis may have
> tested an extremely small atomic bomb--only a small fraction of
> the size of 'Little Boy.' This article also included reports of a
> bright light seen by many that may have been related to the test.
Making a small atomic bomb is much harder than making one the size of
"Little Boy". That was a gun type device using a critical mass of uranium
not an implosion device. There is no evidence the Germans ever got as far
as a reactor. Heisenburg got the critical mass wrong to start with and the
reactor was going to be moderated with heavy water. The entire German
supply of heavy water was destroyed by allied action. You can not make a
dirty bomb from unenriched uranium and there is no evidence that Germany
ever managed to produce that. Japan was probably closer to making a bomb
than Germany.
One possible cause of confusion is that Germany may have used Uranium as
a substitute for tungsten in AP shot. The German weapon programs were
thoroughly investigated after the end of the war.
Ken Young
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- References:
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Prev by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by Date: Re: Linchpin University founded by Inger herself?
- Previous by thread: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by thread: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading