Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:08:04 +1200
On 14 Jun 2005 15:19:28 GMT, Philip Deitiker <Nopdeitik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>In sci.archaeology, Alaca created a message ID
>news:42aea599$0$10200$dbd49001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
>> Eric Stevens wrote: 67msa1db9tsd478omd0n8l7765p5vjkvjc@
>4ax.com,
>> >
>>> You don't seem to know that the Ohman land consisted of
>hills rising
>>> from an existing swamp. Why else do you think they called
>it
>>> 'Runestone Hill'?
>>
>> Because there was a runestone found, allegedly
>
>Runestone hill rises from flat land with adjacent lakes. Along
>the lakes are bogs in some areas, the general area of the
>runestone is characterized by isolated lakes, some of which
>have been dried up. The land itself was elevated with regard
>to the red river.
>
>[Here's how we do it, Eric]
>
>http://www.state.nd.us/ndgs/pembina/Pembina.htm
>http://www.state.nd.us/ndgs/pembina/images/agassiz0.jpg
>http://www.geo.umn.edu/mgs/srtm_15in.jpg
.... and here is how I do it http://tinyurl.com/cmf7c
(Close the advertisement if it pops up in the middle of everything).
Note that the water levels are modern and lower than the 19th century
levels which are now being restored by the construction of dams.
>
>Note that the outline of Agassiz is relatively evident in the
>the 3rd link.
>
>Also you can see topology with the following:
>http://seamless.usgs.gov/website/seamless/viewer.php
>Note that the city of Norcross lies to the east of the flood
>plain and that a second rise lies west of herman, with
>kensington east of second rise.
>
>You should be able to figure out your error should you so
>desire.
Innuendo once again.
What error?
Eric Stevens
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: IEJ
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- References:
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Daryl Krupa
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: IEJ
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alaca
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alaca
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- Prev by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by Date: Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- Previous by thread: Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- Next by thread: Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|