Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Philip Deitiker <Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 05:12:23 GMT
Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> says in
news:mriua1la53u6gtr2rmhds8juddvgkp0d8i@xxxxxxx:
> On 14 Jun 2005 15:19:28 GMT, Philip Deitiker
> <Nopdeitik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>In sci.archaeology, Alaca created a message ID
>>news:42aea599$0$10200$dbd49001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>>
>>> Eric Stevens wrote: 67msa1db9tsd478omd0n8l7765p5vjkvjc@
>>4ax.com,
>>> >
>>>> You don't seem to know that the Ohman land consisted of
>>hills rising
>>>> from an existing swamp. Why else do you think they called
>>it
>>>> 'Runestone Hill'?
>>>
>>> Because there was a runestone found, allegedly
>>
>>Runestone hill rises from flat land with adjacent lakes. Along
>>the lakes are bogs in some areas, the general area of the
>>runestone is characterized by isolated lakes, some of which
>>have been dried up. The land itself was elevated with regard
>>to the red river.
>>
>>[Here's how we do it, Eric]
>>
>>http://www.state.nd.us/ndgs/pembina/Pembina.htm
>>http://www.state.nd.us/ndgs/pembina/images/agassiz0.jpg
>>http://www.geo.umn.edu/mgs/srtm_15in.jpg
>
>
> ... and here is how I do it http://tinyurl.com/cmf7c
>
> (Close the advertisement if it pops up in the middle of
> everything). Note that the water levels are modern and lower
> than the 19th century levels which are now being restored by the
> construction of dams.
The good news is that my street which was built 53 years ago is on
the map, however not much after that is present. I would say you
managed to find the most inaccurate map available on the internet,
that must have been a challenge for you, but you did it.
>>Note that the outline of Agassiz is relatively evident in the
>>the 3rd link.
>>
>>Also you can see topology with the following:
>>http://seamless.usgs.gov/website/seamless/viewer.php
>>Note that the city of Norcross lies to the east of the flood
>>plain and that a second rise lies west of herman, with
>>kensington east of second rise.
>>
>>You should be able to figure out your error should you so
>>desire.
>
> Innuendo once again.
>
> What error?
Eric, when you actually stop trying to be the trickster
and invested as much time trying to actually investigate something
you might actually score a point.
So that you will know what the difference is between experience and
pulling crap out of ones hat.
http://tinyurl.com/99sca
Where you see the words "Matagorda" peninsula, that actual map has no
reflection of current reality. What it shows as swamp land is
actually bay, other areas are elevated land, some of the areas
indicated as bay are swamp land, areas indicated as elevated are
swampland.
The pipe marks the entrance to caney creek cut, it has been there as
since they put the gates on the colorado river 10 or 15 years ago.
http://tinyurl.com/7semt
Brown cedar cut no longer exists.
http://tinyurl.com/corkh
The colorado river used to exit into matagorda bay with overflow to
the gulf, the river was diverted many years ago into the gulf of
mexico, as this map shows, about 10 or 15 years ago the state of
texas place the cut to the gulf on the eastern side of the locks and
dug out a channel for the colorado river into west matagorda bay, as
it used to flow, now the state has absolute control over the flow of
the river. the 10ft isoquant on this map actually has the third
largest river in the state of texas flowing through it (the rio
grande, technically, no longer reaches the gulf of mexico). Minor
technical error, unless, of course, you happen to navigate these
waterways.
You are going to try better next time aren't you?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- References:
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Daryl Krupa
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: IEJ
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alaca
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alaca
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- Prev by Date: Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- Next by Date: Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- Previous by thread: Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- Next by thread: Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|