Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: "Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:21:42 +0200
IEJ wrote: L7yse.140490$dP1.492401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"Alaca" skrev
As long as there are no flying prime saucers in the picture, there is nothing wrong with photographs. The problem here is that they are only a point in space and time. Important is that the area is generaly sloping from the northeast to the southwest. In simple terms that means that every hole in the ground is infiltrated from the north- east and drained to the south-west. That is exactly what you see around the runestone'valley' (in fact three in theory interconnected 'valleys', with the surface between 1350 and 1360 ft).
The watertabel in the lakes west and south is 10 - 20 ft lower, and in the east 20 - 25 ft higher. In order to restore RS'valley in its supposed wet natural conditions, there are two ways: 1. dig it out lower than the groundwaterlevel. 2. block the artificial draining and, depending on the desired waterlevel, create some new dams in the south. And don't breach the road which is blocking it from Eng lake! The second solution is of course the cheapest.
RS'valley' is now wetter than before, but it is not the natural "pre-settlement" situation, because it is a stagnated situation, isolated from the surroundings. One of the aims in my bussiness is to restore autonomous functioning natural systems. The way to do that is a kind of rewinding time to a (arbitrairy) past, by removing as much as possible direct and indirect interfering human influences.
If you take a look at the map (I am looking at a 3x3 mile one) then you see that a lot of roads in the area are in fact functioning as dams, blocking both infiltration and drainage. That is why I earlier wrote that in order to restore the original waterlevel around runestone hill, there are more dams to remove then to construct.
It is difficult for me to predict here and now wat the net result for RS'-valley' would be. But in all cases it is very difficult to imagine RS-hill as an island in a lake. More likely a peninsula in a bog.
Peter, now you are speaking as you were speaking out of the blue. You should have known a bit about this, but you obviously don't......
Inger E
What do you mean? Calling someone wrong is very easy. Please tell me where and why I'm wrong.
-- ¨°º©º°¨Peter Alaca¨°º©º°¨¨°º©º°¨¨°º©º°¨¨°º©º°¨¨°º©º°¨
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- References:
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: IEJ
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alaca
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alaca
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alaca
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alaca
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alaca
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: Alaca
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- From: IEJ
- Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- Prev by Date: Re: Where did they go?
- Next by Date: Re: Gotland crosses
- Previous by thread: Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- Next by thread: Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|