Re: Final thoughts

m_zalar@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: 1119613400.291067.307570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,


[...]
My objective conclusion is, then, that the Kensington
Runestone must be considered a  legitimate object
for further study, and that such study continue until
the issue is resolved (if it can be).
[...]
I hope this will be a jumping off place for those who
would like to inquire further into this curiosity and go
beyond the heated and sometimes questionable
debate in this newsgroup.
[...]
I guess my final advice to all here is to try and check
every fact before you give it credence.  That has
been my rule, anyway.


Thank you Michael, for this final thought, for what you
have done over the years and for your website.

--
¨°º©º°¨Peter Alaca¨°º©º°¨¨°º©º°¨¨°º©º°¨¨°º©º°¨¨°º©º°¨

.