Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press



Eric Stevens wrote:
>
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 08:26:53 +0800, "hyperoglyphe"
> <hyperoglyphe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Seppo Renfors" <Renfors@xxxxxxxxxx> forgot his smileys and wrote
> >in news:42BD0B5E.C3C22E70@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> >> Doug Weller wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:43:39 +1200, in sci.archaeology, Eric Stevens
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >> [..]
> >>>
> >>> Thanks Eric. So far as I know this is pretty accurate. Inger, however,
> >>> wants to go far beyond this to suggest that the Knights Templar never
> >>> ceased to exist.
> >>
> >> Actually Inger is correct, and Douggie is WRONG - his claim would mean
> >> they (Templars) DO NOT EXIST NOW - but they do. Therefor they "never
> >> ceased to exist" is true! Douggie has problems, he cannot use the
> >> language properly to suggest there was a HIATUS - a period, during
> >> which they did not exist, which is a different thing again.
> >>
> >> Here is the proof they exist:
> >>
> >> http://www.knightstemplar.org/
> >
> >There was no hiatus: From http://www.knightstemplar.org/faq.html#origin:
> >
> >"THERE IS NO PROOF OF DIRECT CONNECTION BETWEEN THE ANCIENT ORDER AND THE
> >MODERN ORDER KNOWN TO DAY AS THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR."
>
> "King Dinis didn't believe the accusations made against the
> Templars, and when the Pope dissolved the Templars, he decided
> to form a new order, to which the Templar holdings would be
> given.
>
> It is unclear whether many Templars continued in the new order.
> Some writers seem to think that the Templars just continued under
> a new name, whereas others think that the Order of Christ was a
> new formation."
>
> Certainly the same assets. Probably some of the same people. Sounds
> like the kind of trick construction companies get up to.

Please ignore the hyperNazi (currently being dealt with by my idiot
filter), it cannot even read - let alone comprehend what little it is
able to read. Once more it totally missed the point it attempts to
respond to. I have never made a claim "there is a direct connection"
as it claimed - it is a strawman it built so it can knock it down
again to claim a "victory", - only it fails even then!

"The Knights Templar is a Christian-oriented fraternal organization
based on the ancient organization that was founded in the 11th
century." - and that is sourced from it's own reference! That is to
say, it is a "revival" of the ancient order to fit modern times.

--
Criminal Tony Smith the stalker need not respond
http://tinyurl.com/al225
http://tinyurl.com/alznw
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
    ... There is no direct connection ... >>> between the Templar and the Masons. ... >> between the Templars and the Masons. ... >> there is no written history and that centuries later historians knew ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Kensington runestone Vegetation)in the Scandinavian press
    ... >> "King Dinis didn't believe the accusations made against the ... >> Templars, and when the Pope dissolved the Templars, he decided ... Who is this Hypernazi? ... I have never made a claim "there is a direct connection" ...
    (sci.archaeology)
Quantcast