Re: Sorry! The Phaistos disc.



O.H. wrote:
> The inscription consists of 53 different signgroups, which all can be
> linked together in one single chain by this procedure without
> involving the very frequent initial element of BA and so the final
> thorns:
>
> A12) DY_cBA
> A27) ØÅ_Y
> A10) ØÅ_fBA
> A17) MLØW_BA
> B04) XW_E
> A14) ZY_bXW_A
> A28) DC_b
> B12) UDXW
>
> A12 and A27 by sign Y
> A27 and A10 by sign Å
> A10 and A17 by sign Ø
> A17 and B04 by sign W
> B04 and A14 by sign X
> A14 and A28 by sign c
> A28 and B12 by sign D

This has NO MEANING !..
I can do the same with ANY SENTENCE, for instance your following one :
> The Phaistos disc inscription do not fit together ...

My "Groups" are : T, GE, ER (+ reduced group E), PHAI, DI, CR (+reduced
group C), IN (+reduced group N)

C1 : T-h-E
C8 : T-o-GE-T-h-ER

are linked by sign h

C2 : PHAI-s-T-o-s
C3 : DI-s-C
C4 : IN-s-CR
are linked together by sign s

C5 : D-o
C6 : N-o-T
C8 : T-o-GE
are linked together by sign o

Etc.

> The Phaistos disc inscription do not fit together with syllables.
> It is rather some annual ledger.

HOW can you write such a thing when 1)- There is ONE decipherment (the
"Proto-Ionic Solution) which is COMPLETE, giving a PERFECT MEANING to
the text , PERFECTLY IN ACCORDANCE with what we know about Greek
Linguistics, and epigraphically UNASSAILABLE 2)- of which ALL THE
CONSEQUENCES (more than 30!) have been VERIFIED BY FACTS.

Are you out of your mind to make such a statement without having
seriously examined this solution and - eventually !- found something
wrong in it ?????

grapheus

.