Re: Sorry! The Phaistos disc.

On 28 Jun 2005 06:48:29 -0700, "grapheus" <grapheus@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
>O=2EH. wrote:
>> The inscription consists of 53 different signgroups, which all can be
>> linked together in one single chain by this procedure without
>> involving the very frequent initial element of BA and so the final
>> thorns:
>>
>> A12) DY_cBA
>> A27) =D8=C5_Y
>> A10) =D8=C5_fBA
>> A17) ML=D8W_BA
>> B04) XW_E
>> A14) ZY_bXW_A
>> A28) DC_b
>> B12) UDXW
>>
>> A12 and A27 by sign Y
>> A27 and A10 by sign =C5
>> A10 and A17 by sign =D8
>> A17 and B04 by sign W
>> B04 and A14 by sign X
>> A14 and A28 by sign c
>> A28 and B12 by sign D
>
>This has NO MEANING !..
>I can do the same with ANY SENTENCE, for instance your following one :
>> The Phaistos disc inscription do not fit together ...
>
>My "Groups" are : T, GE, ER (+ reduced group E), PHAI, DI, CR (+reduced
>group C), IN (+reduced group N)
>
>C1 : T-h-E
>C8 : T-o-GE-T-h-ER
>
>are linked by sign h
>
>C2 : PHAI-s-T-o-s
>C3 : DI-s-C
>C4 : IN-s-CR
>are linked together by sign s
>
>C5 : D-o
No, it was not allowed to use the same letter in both connections, as
you do to the "do". Besides the words are much longer in alphabetic
script.
>C6 : N-o-T
>C8 : T-o-GE
>are linked together by sign o
>
>Etc.
>
>> The Phaistos disc inscription do not fit together with syllables.
>> It is rather some annual ledger.
>
>HOW can you write such a thing when 1)- There is ONE decipherment (the
>"Proto-Ionic Solution) which is COMPLETE, giving a PERFECT MEANING to
>the text , PERFECTLY IN ACCORDANCE with what we know about Greek
>Linguistics, and epigraphically UNASSAILABLE 2)- of which ALL THE
>CONSEQUENCES (more than 30!) have been VERIFIED BY FACTS.
>
>Are you out of your mind to make such a statement without having
>seriously examined this solution and - eventually !- found something
>wrong in it ?????
>
>grapheus
>
No, but in my view of the picture signs, they are as integrated into
the entirety by symmetries, as perfect as the patterns in a Persian
embroidery

Hagen
.