Re: KRS: Final thoughts


"Erik Hammerstad" <egeha.is.all.you.need@xxxxxxxx> skrev i
meddelandet news:3ic9joFipe1uU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

snip

By the way
> professor Sköld notes that the use of the double dots in
the runes
> dates them to not earlier than the 18th century, as that's
when
> the double dots in the ö (oe) and the ä (ae) first
appeared in
> Swedish printing.
>


Does anybody know more about DS 2268
http://fmpro.ra.se/ra/medeltid/pdf/3045.pdf


> Interestingly, Tryggve Sköld is continuing his
investigation of
> the KRS language, see (in Swedish, sorry)
> http://www2.sofi.se/daum/katta/katta15/katta15.pdf.
Assuming the
> text to be modern he is making a case for its author being
a
> Norwegian from Northern Østerdalen, possibly with some
> modifications being made by a Swedish carver from Dalarna.
This
> for someone interested in pointing to possible
perpetrators (Sköld
> agrees it was not Ohman).
>

Prof. Sköld seems to be unaware of the early use of 'h' in
'ahr'
and the spelling of day as 'dagh'. He has an obvious bias.

>From 'Svenskt diplomatariums huvudkartotek över
medeltidsbreven' at;

http://62.20.57.212/ra/medeltid/soksida.html

The numbers are...

Brevnummer (Number of letter)
Årtal (Date of letter,year only)
then the relevant text is quoted.

4465
1339
æpter wars Herra byrdh Tusandhe arum, ok tryhundradha ahrum,
ok trettigi
ahrum, ok a nyondha areno niclatinsa *) dag &c.


5441
1347
Breffuet war giffwit i Rydhe, ahret effter Gudz byrdh, M.
CCC. XL. septimo,
annan dagen effter trinitatis, vnder waro dorn Jnsigle
nærwarandhe Halstens
Pæthersons.

5442
1347
Detta breff war giffuit i wexsio, ahret epter Gudz byrdh M.
CCC. XL.
septimo, annan dagen epter trinitatis, vnder waro dom
Jnsigle, nærwarande
Halstene Petharson.

16088
1403
æpther thet the æra æy till laga ahra kommin, ta pantsættiom
wij føre

16227
1404
at æpter wors Herra byrdh mcd pa thet fiærdhe aahr, thæn
tisdagh nest føre
Kynndelmesso dagh i wort hærbære pa wort slot Stokholmen

16244
1404
Jak Olaff Haralsson, vnderlagman i Vplandom, kænnes føre
allum och betyger
thet medh thesso mino opno breffue att ahreno effter Gudz
byrdh tusanda
ahrom, fyrahundrada ahrom ok a fiærda ahreno, næsta tisdagen
effter sancte
Sigfridz dag


16313
1404
Skrifwit stad, ahr och dag føreskrifwen.

16393
1405
kennandes openbara medh thesse var nærwarandes opne breff at
wy samma worom
i Enekøping sextonde dagh jvla, ahr och dagh som thetta
breff vthwiser

39746
1375
Thet se allom kunnuth ath aahrum eftir wars Herra byrd
MCCC(o)LXXV(o) ok a
annan torsdagin næst war efftir præstamoth, tha war Olafwir
i [Wlla
stefna](b) a waro thinge ok loot Hakonne i Tigbÿle ett
halfwt(c) markland j


JerryT


> > And the 'complete set' of runes is not found in the
Larsson papers, by
> > the way - there are still some differences.
>
> The differences are quite within the variability normally
found in
> rune inscriptions.
>




.