Re: Inventio Fortunata [Was: KRS: Final thoughts]

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:57:24 GMT, Philip Deitiker
<Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

--- snip ----

> It also includes a thread from 1998 that you participated in
>via private discussions with Doug.

Is that right Doug?

Does Philip really have access to private discussions on this subject
between us (not that I remember any)?

I would be surprised to find that this is the case.

--- snip ----



Eric Stevens

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Inventio Fortunata [Was: KRS: Final thoughts]
    ... >>>via private discussions with Doug. ... > Mercator's information doesn't come from Nicholas of Lynn. ... author of The Kalendarium of Nicholas ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Tom n Doug debates
    ... The posts trying to stir the pot should end. ... private and threatening e-mails is the clue that it's gone way over the ... Doug and others have reaped enough from this for now. ...
    (rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz)
  • Accessing A Computer With A Private IP Address
    ... my computer has a private IP address rather ... Because I use Windows XP Professional's IIS to ... test my web site, I ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis)
  • Re: Inventio Fortunata [Was: KRS: Final thoughts]
    ... >>via private discussions with Doug. ... But isn't he responding to Steve? ... I have very little to do with Philip now and so far as I can recall ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Wild kettle and oxen
    ... >Apart from Philip and Tom no people with a love ... I don't see him as having a love for archaeology in the sense I ... Doug Weller -- exorcise the demon to reply ...
    (sci.archaeology)