What's So Important About KRS?
- From: "Andy68" <andyandy68@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jun 2005 10:01:14 -0700
So, I've been lurking around here for a while because I think
archaeology is an interesting subject. I couldn't help but notice that
there seems to be a small amount of disagreement about a carved stone
found in America. Looking through the threads, I find that this
disagreement has been going on for a long, long time.
I am wondering what the importance is to people arguing both sides?
Maybe some people who have been posting could reply to this with a note
about why they think this issue is important, how they are personally
invested in it, etc. I'd like a little "background" in order to read
the threads.
Thanks,
Andy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What's So Important About KRS?
- From: IEJ
- Re: What's So Important About KRS?
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: What's So Important About KRS?
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: What's So Important About KRS?
- From: bogart . lloy
- Re: What's So Important About KRS?
- Prev by Date: Re: Sorry! The Phaistos disc.
- Next by Date: Re: What's So Important About KRS?
- Previous by thread: Re: Templars first bankers?
- Next by thread: Re: What's So Important About KRS?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|