Re: Linguists and the words on KRS
- From: Kjetil Rå Hauge <k.r.hauge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:51:14 +0200
On 05-07-05 12:31, in article oktye.28639$d5.181786@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "IEJ"
<Inger_ejohansson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> "Seppo Renfors" <Renfors@xxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
> news:42C9D4AB.80C9F130@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[snip]
>
> Alan's knowledge of Medieval Swedish is slim. If he is better in Medieval
> Norwegian, I have no idea about, but.....
>>
>> It has been demonstrated by Inger to exist in the correct era, but not
>> only by her - IIRC Terry did too!
>
> "thæn fornempde akar at hemble (1) fori hwars mans tiltala . "
> 1st November 1371 Linköping. origin parchment RA 0101
>
> Inger E
It is the plural that is under discussion. This "mans" is the regular
genitive singular and is irrelevant to the point.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linguists and the words on KRS
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Linguists and the words on KRS
- References:
- Re: Linguists and the words on KRS
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Linguists and the words on KRS
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Linguists and the words on KRS
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Linguists and the words on KRS
- From: IEJ
- Re: Linguists and the words on KRS
- Prev by Date: Re: Vinland
- Next by Date: Re: Vinland
- Previous by thread: Re: Linguists and the words on KRS
- Next by thread: Re: Linguists and the words on KRS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|