Re: T-Rex latest

"Nog" <nognog@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:_5SdnTfrVoiKjUjfRVn-vw@xxxxxxxxxxxx:


> Archaeology is a branch of Paleontology. You just specialize in only
> the human connection where paleontology includes all fossil studies.

Couple of things:

1) Archaeology is not _anthropology_, part of which is a study of
human fossils and which, if you s*t*r*e*t*c*h things, _could_
be considered it a "branch" of paleontology. Of course,
anthropology _also_ could be considered a "branch" of biology
...or a branch of sociology...or...

_Archaeology_, meanwhile, is a branch of history, if anything,
with some branching from paleontology and engineering and a half-
dozen other things thrown in.

2) That Oncology (that's the study of cancer, in case you don't
know) is a branch of biology does _not_ mean that readers of,
say, alt.support.cancer.breast, will be interested in the
latest report on the life cycle of the sparrow - just because
that's _also_ under "biology."

> Your group is so dead you need to broaden your horizons.

3) When _we_ broaden our horizons, we do it by, oh, I don't know,
_going to other usenet groups_. It's fairly simple, you know.

> You conceded assholes

4) I haven't conceded anything...

> It's all science.

5) You obviously haven't read this group...

6) Oh, BTW - *PLONK*

David

--
David Johnson http://home.earthlink.net/~trolleyfan
"You're a loony, you are!"
"They said that about Galileo, they said that about Einstein..."
"Yeah, and they said it about a good few loonies, too."

Remove "_nospam" to email
.

Quantcast