Re: VM reading lesson
- From: "Steve Marcus" <smarcus_spamout_@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:11:11 -0400
"Tom McDonald" <tmcdonald2672@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:j8UCe.10873$1Y1.7819@xxxxxxxxxxx
> IEJ wrote:
>> "maison.mousse" <maison.mousse@xxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
>> news:42dbeabc$0$22291$8fcfb975@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>>IEJ a écrit dans le message ...
>>>
>>>>Doug,
>>>>lousier homework then that made by Towe exists, but not many has made so
>>>>many major mistakes as he has done from a position equal or above his.
>>>>His studies and works in the VM question doesn't show the quality,
>>>
>>>precision
>>>
>>>>and correct argumentation as he is known to present.
>>>>
>>>>Inger E
>>>>
>>>
>>>Nothing in Towe's work is up to date he has not tested
>>>or as far as known even seen the map.
>>>He can only rely on the test run by the various laboratories. The
>>>conclusions of these various analysis
>>>was that the map as far as can be determined is genuine. Unless further
>>>test can be done is labs just as
>>>well equipped and by those just as qualified , the results
>>>stand.
>>>JL
>>
>>
>> And that's what we wait for the Danes who performed such tests to present
>> their verdict on.
>
> And yet, she has no trouble jumping to conclusions before the fact.
>
>> Please observe that they doesn't seem to have any of Towe's thoughts
>> regarding the ink.
>
> Does anyone know if the Danes were planning to investigate the ink?
>
>> For them as they presented their halfway short
>> information it seems to be all about the parchment. Is the parchment same
>> type, not only age, as the Tartar documents, which type of parchment has
>> been used, where was that parchment 'made' etc.
>
> Interesting questions. I will wait patiently for the Danes to *FINISH*
> their work.
>
>> The ink problem is no more
>> since it's shown that a 1437 formula, observe that it wasn't Olin that
>> found
>> that one, gives exact same ink as on VM anatase size included.
>
> Anyone know where this wonder of scientific work can be investigated? Or
> is this one of Inger's hold-back cards. (IOW, fantasy.)
>
>> This means
>> that anyone putting forward VM as being forged must at least have an idea
>> how the proposed forger between the time he is supposed to have forged it
>> and last years could be the only one having had knowledge of and access
>> to
>> that formula......
>
> And that formula is? Including the source of the anatase, size of the
> particles, and other ingredients?
As is normally the case, this is simply pure fantasy on Inger's part.
>
> --
> Tom McDonald
> http://ahwhatdoiknow.blogspot.com/
Steve
--
The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either. This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
.
- References:
- VM reading lesson
- From: maison.mousse
- Re: VM reading lesson
- From: hyperoglyphe
- Re: VM reading lesson
- From: Doug Weller
- Re: VM reading lesson
- From: IEJ
- Re: VM reading lesson
- From: maison.mousse
- Re: VM reading lesson
- From: IEJ
- Re: VM reading lesson
- From: Tom McDonald
- VM reading lesson
- Prev by Date: Re: VM reading lesson
- Next by Date: Re: VM reading lesson
- Previous by thread: Re: VM reading lesson
- Next by thread: Re: VM reading lesson
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|