Re: Teouma skeletons....
- From: Philip Deitiker <Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:49:18 GMT
"qiwi" <marym@xxxxxx> says in
news:1122022357.264219.281880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> verbatim in these reports. Or do you think that on the
> television item Geoff Chambers words have been deleted and
> somebody has overdubbed the imbecilic comments in their place.
Certainly not the human biology paper, you cannot even find its
abstract on Pubmed, and no abstracts from 2005. I actually had to do
a manual search of the journal to get the abstract to begin with.
The only imbecil at present is the one who is acting in denial.
.
- References:
- Teouma skeletons....
- From: qiwi
- Re: Teouma skeletons....
- From: qiwi
- Re: Teouma skeletons....
- From: benlizross
- Re: Teouma skeletons....
- From: qiwi
- Re: Teouma skeletons....
- From: benlizross
- Re: Teouma skeletons....
- From: qiwi
- Teouma skeletons....
- Prev by Date: Re: Teouma skeletons....
- Next by Date: Re: does this say what I think it says?
- Previous by thread: Re: Teouma skeletons....
- Next by thread: Re: Teouma skeletons....
- Index(es):