Re: Kensington Runestone Wikipedia 28th July 2005
Seppo Renfors wrote: 42F80A6D.9CB728BA@xxxxxxxxxx,
Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 22:31:30 GMT, "ie" <I_e,johansson@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
[..]
Claims as to the 'dating' of the KRS have been discussed in this
newsgroup many times in the past. As far as I know the closest that
anyone has come to 'dating' the stone is the claim of Scott Wolters
that at the time it was found it was +200 years old. That does not
establish a date. It does not even establish a proper date range.
Don't be silly, of course it has a "date range" it is that period
between 1362 and the "+200 years old". It is plenty accurate enough
for this item as it proves the authenticity of the rune stone - it
leaves no room for doubt.
[..]
No room but 400 years.
.
